November 29, 2020
Here, below, is the evidence presented in court and public hearings, to date, claiming that the Nov 3, 2020 general election for President was illegitimate. Read it and judge for yourself.
I have read it and am forming my own assessment on the quality and integrity of the evidence. I invite you to do the same. Don’t rely on news outlets, don’t rely on political commentators, and don’t necessarily rely on the courts. Read and judge for yourself.
Several of these cases already have been tossed out by courts on procedural grounds, not on their inherent merits or lack thereof. It’s up to you to make a distinction between procedural flaws and intrinsic merits.
It is also up to you to decide if the evidence, such as it is and as it continues to become public, stands a chance of resolution in a court of law, given the procedural maneuvers available to attorneys for both plaintiffs and defendants. Judges render their decisions based on the cogency of the legal arguments, supported by cherry-picked case law, from both sides. This is why it’s all-important to hire a cunning, shrewd, and brilliant law firm. (These are lawyers who can get an acquittal for Jack the Ripper.)
I’m not trying to persuade a court that the election was phony and stolen from Mr. Trump. Nor am I trying to persuade you. I’m saying, “Look, here is the evidence so far. You decide for yourself. If you think the evidence is flimsy, then so be it. If you think it’s compelling, then so be it.”
If you think it’s flimsy, more than likely you think the vote was legit—not tampered with. In which case you might conclude Calvin Martin has worked himself into an unnecessary lather over all this. Except for one thing, one flaw in the argument, which is that I’m concerned about the millions of people (I may be exaggerating this number) who seem convinced the voting machines and paper ballots were outrageously compromised, with votes often fabricated or discarded. I worry that people will lose confidence in the vote, and I don’t want them to.
You see, I’m not prepared to “polarize.” People on both sides of the issue are my kinsmen: neighbors, friends, relatives, and fellow Americans. I don’t believe in civil wars. I don’t believe in riots and mayhem and hatred. What I believe in is empirical evidence: a demonstrably valid vote.
If this vote is not demonstrably valid, yes, after the fact, then America has a huge problem on its hands.
The Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee held a public hearing on Nov 25, 2020 to discuss 2020 election issues and irregularities at the request of Republican Senator Doug Mastriano. It’s 3 hours long. It’s well worth watching. It begins with a presentation of evidence by Mr. Giuliani, followed by approx. 18 witnesses.
My wife, Dr. Pierpont, listened to the entire hearing. She took notes, below, with a time stamp attached. (See, for instance, p. 1, para. 3, 0:16 Witness 1: Justin Kweder, Esq. This means you can slide the control button to the 16-minute mark to begin listening to Attorney Kweder’s testimony. Below this, see 0:23 Witness 2: Kim Peterson. Slide the control button to the 23-minute mark to begin listening to her. And so on.)